A.....
post-Katrina Uncle Remus Joseph Campbell hero’s journey Norse saga
Terry Gilliam magical realism Eco-apocalyptic fable- ALL on a po’boy
bun! You’ll need more than two hands to handle THIS whopper. Sure,
it’s a tall tale but the really big whopper is the inscrutable
swooning gushing forth from the main stream critics (Ebert, the Times
A. O. Scott) who seemed to have succumbed to some unseen siren’s
call and crashed themselves blissfully on the rocks of delirium. Read
their reviews with wary mind and a syringe of insulin.
Like
most, I read the glowing reviews and on the face of it, this is an
interesting and seemingly original tale. Especially compared to the
tripe churning from Hollywood’s loins these days. But drilling down
past the sentimentality, the precocious young girl actress who seems
to have bewitched all, a heart of darkness engulfs and the sweetness
sours. There is something just
wrong
with this film.
Briefly:
Once
upon a time, there was a little girl named Hush Puppy who lived with
her Daddy in a place called the Bathtub. It existed on the wrong side
of a levee in the Louisiana Bayou where any major storm could come
along and the ocean would reclaim it for its own. Folk were poor,
living off whatever the sea would provide: food, money from what they
could catch and sell, the flotsam and jetsam providing material for
shelter. Different races lived side by side in harmony, solidarity
and independence from the outside world-that which existed on the
other side of the levee. Unlike those outsiders who celebrated but
once a year, the Bathtub denizens partied often, with glee and gusto,
drink and food aplenty. Hush Puppy was wise beyond her years,
knowing that everything in the universe is connected. She was taught
in school that an Eco-Apocalypse was coming and she imagined that the
Auroch-a long-extinct gigantic hog- like creature, would thaw out and
come to destroy the weak, like her. Her daddy was a rough man but he
meant to teach his heir apparent to be self-reliant and tough for,
alas, he was ill. A big storm came and nearly destroyed the Bathtub,
first with water but later with salt-poisoning from the invading
ocean. Men from the Bathtub lead by Daddy, dynamited a hole in the
levee to let the ocean out of their land. The government discovered
that there were people still out in the Bathtub and forced them to
evacuate “for their own good.”
Ok.
At this point, you’re thinking-oh, such an Eden. Such joyous
humans. Such fierce independent beings. Bad, Bad government. And
such a bright little girl. What an imagination on that little peeler!
But
wait. Let’s have a reality check. Daddy is a violent man. A violent
man. If he isn’t physically hitting Hush Puppy, he is yelling at
her, demeaning her. In fact, he talks like he is disappointed she is
not a boy. He constantly says “hey, man” to her, “you're gonna
be the king one day” and refers to her in male terminology. Only
when he demeans her-to scold her, he finally acknowledges her
gender-”oh you are just a weak little girl”. In his mind, he is
being tough to make her tough in that uneducated, trash logic. The
denizens of the Bathtub are not the brightest. Drunk much of the
time. Living in incredible squalor. Yet the film tries to romanticize
this in the most egregious of White attitudes: the noble savage. A.O.
Scott of the Times even tries to tag them with a Libertarian label
because they ran out of the shelters in an imagined act of declining
government help. Noooo. They don’t have a clue what Libertarian
means. Their act was not political, it was the act of near feral
beings who were running back to reclaim that scrap of land that they
considered theirs.
Ebert
and Scott, didn’t you get the title? BEASTS of the Southern
Wilds refers to the humans as much as to the critters. And
it ain’t a compliment. C’mon now. What do these people do? What
are their concerns? Hush Puppy gives the clue when she talks about
critters: “they just be eatin' and shittin'”. I would add fucking
and drinking. How do they solve problems? Daddy doesn’t call up the
UN. No, his default is violence. His kid sasses him, he smacks her.
The authorities mess up his land, he blows a hole in the dike. The
hurricane comes to destroy his stuff, he shoots at it with a shotgun.
You
want to go down the stereotype lane? OK, what the director/writers
have done here is portray yet again the big, bad ass nigger. Angry,
aggressive, animal-like in his demeanor and his desires. Women are
only sexual objects-his wife seen through his eyes as hot hot hot.
Hell, she sets shit on fire when she walks past.
More
objectionable is the sexualization of Hush Puppy and her girl pals.
Late in the film, she decides to look for her mama. They take off
swimming and are picked up by a tug and are taken to a floating
whorehouse. The women there are shown to be the stereotypical whores
with the hearts of gold-cooing, lavishing the young girls with
attention supposedly because they haven’t seen children, only men
for sooo long. Yet, in the dancing scene, they hold the young girls
like lovers not children. Very creepy.
And
what of Hush Puppy? Abandoned by her mama, hurt and demeaned by her
daddy and now he is dead. Does anyone actually think she is ok? Has
she learned enough lessons to survive? In the real world, no. But the
film tries to make her out as the queen apparent of the Bathtub,
ready to rule.
The
inclusion of the Aurochs-silly. Yeah it gives the cache of weirdness
and mysticism to the film. They bow down to the big bad girl/queen of
the Bathtub. Pretty obvious these guys have watched Terry Gilliam.
And, it throws in another dash of pet Liberalism the film makers seem
to exude-Al Gore's Global Warming.
Worse,
sending Daddy off in his flaming truck/boat to join the relatives in
Bathtub Valhalla, while the mourners recite Bathtub tribal liturgy
made me cringe for the pretentiousness of it all. Oh please.
I’ll
give the crew who made this film their due: they crafted a good
looking film on a shoestring budget. On the extras reel you can see
how they created the illusions and again, well done there. But
frankly, what was it that made the critics swoon? Original? Compared
to the recent Zombie/Vampirethons, the endless remakes and mining of
Marvel Comics,well, yes it is. But it doesn’t stand up to much
scrutiny which I feel the mainstream critics failed to do or chose
not to. I can only recommend this for those who want to see what the
hoopla was about.
Bin
was disturbed by the Aurochs and decided to give the whole film a
pass. He muttered something about them being vaguely familiar and
disappeared for the afternoon to hang out in his safe place under the
evergreens.
Feel
like comparing films? Watch Terry Gilliam's Tideland. Yep, it
has a creep factor and he caught a huge rash of pillorying from many
critics for….sexualization of a young girl. Take a look at his
fable telling and compare. Look at his visuals. Beasts pales
in comparison. Warning, it’s a tough film with a tough subject
matter. But afterward, wonder as I did how the director of Beasts
got a pass and Gilliam did not. Why Beasts was gushed over,
nominated for a boatload of Academy Awards and Gilliam had tomatoes
thrown at him.
For
a blistering review, strap yourself in and read bell hooks's thoughts
on this film. Now, she has been and continues to be quite the
uncompromising bomb thrower of the feminist movement's radical wing.
Having said this, I found her take on this film evocative and
I found several times that she expressed what I was feeling but
unable to put my finger on.